Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  187 / 236 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 187 / 236 Next Page
Page Background

TÜRKİYE İŞ BANKASI A.Ş.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended

31 December 2014

187

İŞBANK

ANNUAL REPORT 2014

FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND

RISK MANAGEMENT

17. Information on Value Adjustments and Change in Credit Provisions

Beginning Balance Provisions Reversal of Provisions

Other Value Adjustments

(1)

Ending Balance

Specific Provisions

1,929,981

977,444

(890,750)

(11,970)

2,004,705

General Provisions

2,100,602 398,986

(11,669)

(8,149)

2,479,770

(1)

Stating foreign exchange gains and losses.

III. Explanations on Consolidated Market Risk:

1. Explanations on Consolidated Market Risk:

The market risk carried by the Group is measured by two separate methods known respectively as the Standard Method and the Value at Risk (VAR) Method in accordance with the

local regulations adopted from internationally accepted practices. In this context, currency risk emerges as the most important component of the market risk. The consolidated market

risk measurements are carried out on a quarterly basis, using the Standard Method. The results are accounted in the legal reporting and evaluated with the top management.

The VAR Method is another alternative for the Standard Method in measuring and monitoring market risk carried by the Parent Bank. This model is used to measure the market risk on

a daily basis in terms of interest rate risk, currency risk and equity share risk and is a part of the Parent Bank’s daily internal reporting. Further retrospective testing (back-testing) is

carried out on a daily basis to determine the reliability of the daily risk calculation by the VAR model, which is used to estimate the maximum possible loss for the following day.

Scenario analyses which support the VAR method used to measure the losses that may occur in the ordinary market conditions are practiced, and the possible impacts of scenarios

that are developed based on the future predictions and the past crises, on the value of the Parent Bank’s portfolio are determined and the results are reported to the Top Executive

Management. Financial participations also make VAR calculations within the frame determined by the Parent Bank, and the results are reported to the Parent Bank’s top management.

The limits set for the market risk management within the framework of the Parent Bank’s asset liability management risk policy, are monitored by the Risk Committee and reviewed in

accordance with the market conditions.

The following table shows details of the market risk calculations carried out within the context of “Standard Method for Market Risk Measurement” and in compliance with “Regulation

on Measurement and Evaluation of Capital Adequacy of Banks” as of 31 December 2014.

1.a. Information on the market risk:

Amount

(I) Capital Requirement against General Market Risk – Standard Method

64,190

(II) Capital Requirement against Specific Risk – Standard Method

118,422

Capital Requirement for Specific Risk Related to Securitization Positions-Standard Method

(III) Capital Requirement against Currency Risk – Standard Method

439,237

(IV) Capital Requirement against Commodity Risk – Standard Method

39,306

(V) Capital Requirement against Exchange Risk – Standard Method

(VI) Capital Requirement against Market Risk of Options – Standard Method

7,363

(VII) Capital Requirement against Counterparty Credit Risk-Standard Method

63,490

(VIII) Capital Requirement against Market Risks of Banks Applying Risk Measurement Models

(IX) Total Capital Requirement against Market Risk (I+II+III+IV+V+VI+VII)

732,008

(X) Value at Market Risk (12.5 x VIII) or (12.5 x IX)

9,150,100

1.b. Table of the average market risk related to the market risk calculated quarterly during the period:

Current Period

Prior Period

(1)

Average

Highest

(2)

Lowest

(2)

Average

Highest

(2)

Lowest

(2)

Interest Rate Risk

77,490

83,508

76,256

67,836

84,836

70,014

Share Certificate Risk

81,263

99,104

70,765

82,921

66,840

79,167

Currency Risk

325,962

439,237

192,937

176,745

244,266

130,770

Commodity Risk

27,013

39,306

22,933

27,783

53,139

24,797

Settlement Risk

445

310

879

678

361

Options Risk

4,441

7,363

2,961

4,593

492

8,777

Counterparty Credit Risk

71,062

63,490

108,691

56,583

87,866

44,351

Total Value at Risk

7,345,950

9,150,100

5,935,663

5,216,750

6,726,463

4,477,963

(1)

The balances are calculated as three-month period.

(2)

Market risk elements are presented for the monthly periods where total value at risk is minimum and maximum.

2. Information on counterparty credit risk:

A counterparty credit risk, which is accounts for trading derivatives and repo transactions tracked on both sides, such as the credit risk the liability arising from transactions, is

determined by the methodology which is used according to the Appendix-2 of the "Regulation on Measurement and Evaluation of Capital Adequacy of Banks" which is published on

the Official Gazette no.28337 dated 28 June 2012 and became effective starting from 1 July 2007. Counterparty credit risk valuation method based on the calculation of the fair value

of the derivative transactions is implemented. The calculation of the amount of risk on derivative transactions, the potential amount of credit risk is positively correlated with the

sum of the costs of renewal. The calculation of the amount of the potential credit risk of the contract amount is multiplied by the rates given in the regulation. Derivative instruments

valuation based on replacement costs and the fair value of the related contracts are obtained.

The Bank is exposed to counterparty credit risk is managed within the framework of general principles and guarantees the credit limit allocation. Exposure to credit risk of derivative

transactions with banks due to the majority of reciprocal agreements signed with related parties are subject to the daily exchange of collateral, counterparty credit risk exposure

is reduced in this way. On the other hand, the calculation of capital adequacy under the legislation of counterparty credit risk, the risk-reducing effect of such agreements is not

considered.

Within the scope of trading accounts with credit derivatives acquired or disposed of by the Bank does not have any protection.